Tricity
Chandigarh: Status of a profession does not place a person above the law, says HC while denying interim bail to a lawyer
The High Court denied interim bail to lawyer Anurag Khullar, booked for cheating, emphasizing that professional status does not exempt anyone from the law.
Chandigarh: The High Court has denied interim bail to lawyer Anurag Khullar, who was booked by Chandigarh police on May 13 on charges of cheating. The court ruled that the status of a profession does not place a person above the law, emphasizing that no professional identity can shield an individual from legal accountability.
Khullar, a practising advocate, approached the court seeking temporary release while the investigation continued. His petition argued that his professional standing should be considered for bail, but the bench rejected the request, stating that the alleged offences were serious and could affect both the complainants and the integrity of the judicial process.
The police complaint filed on May 13 alleged that Khullar had engaged in deceptive practices that amounted to cheating. Authorities said the conduct not only harmed the complainants but also affected the integrity of the judicial process. While the specifics of the alleged fraud have not been detailed in the court’s order, the police maintained that the case required a thorough probe.
In delivering the order, the High Court underscored a longstanding legal principle: a person’s occupation does not confer any exemption from criminal liability. The bench observed that the status of a profession does not place a person above the law, reinforcing that all individuals, regardless of occupation, must submit to due process.
The denial of interim bail reflects the court’s cautious approach in cases where the alleged crime threatens the fairness of judicial proceedings. By refusing temporary release, the judges signaled that the investigation’s progress and the protection of the judicial process take precedence over compassionate considerations for the accused.
Legal experts note that such decisions are consistent with precedents where courts have refused bail in offences that could influence witnesses or tamper with evidence. The High Court’s stance aligns with broader efforts to safeguard the credibility of the legal system, especially when the accused holds a role that commands public trust.
Khullar’s case is likely to be examined further as the investigation proceeds. The police have indicated that the inquiry is ongoing. Until then, the lawyer remains before the court, and his bail plea will be revisited during the regular bail hearing.
The episode adds to a series of recent instances where professionals from various fields have found themselves entangled in criminal investigations. While the legal system continues to hold individuals accountable, the episode serves as a reminder that professional reputation does not guarantee immunity.
Authorities in Chandigarh have reiterated their commitment to a transparent investigation, promising that the outcome will be guided by evidence rather than perception. The High Court’s decision underscores the expectation that the rule of law applies uniformly, regardless of the accused’s background.
Source: Hindustan Times
